Wednesday, 14 May 2014

Explaining this ‘Feminist Liberal’ thing.


Okay, I think it’s about time I put some clarity on my increasing usage of the term ‘feminist liberal,’ as without explaining it I’m leaving myself open to misunderstanding and attacks based on that misunderstanding. The following description is what I mean when I mean the term ‘feminist liberal.’

A feminist liberal is (normally) a younger person, in their twenties or early thirties, who has been through the mainstream indoctrination process that is the modern school/and or university system. The more ‘education’ this person has, the more enslaved he or she is to the feminist liberal brainwashing. This kind of person will instantly take the moral high-ground on all subjects, and tell you that you are an intolerant and hateful person if you don’t agree with their borrowed opinions. The feminist liberal is of both genders. The female version will be very entitled and feel like she is a victim of a male centred society that is oppressing her because she is a woman. She will be very angry, very intolerant, very aggressive, very violent, very egotistical and constantly trying to prove to everybody that she is ‘just as good as a man.’ She will be career orientated, and if that career doesn’t work out she will become increasingly angry and resentful to all men, who she will blame for her failure. She will be a statist (government supporter) who is pro abortion, pro gay-rights, pro religious rights and pro everything else that could loosely be termed as ‘liberal’ and talked about by mainstream heroes like John Stewart and Bill Maher. She will spend all of her time online acting as the thought Police where she will call people racist, or sexist whilst ignoring any real racism and sexism, especially if it comes from non-white people, and especially if it comes from one of the western friendly dictatorships like Saudi Arabia, a country blighted by real, state sanctioned racism, sexism and homophobia.

And what about her male counterpart, you might ask? The male version of the feminist liberal is a sad sack, emasculated shadow of a man. He feels guilty, but doesn’t know what he should feel guilty about. He’s a total doormat for all women, and is happy to be so as his liberal feminism education has made him feel utterly confused about being a male. All he knows is that being a man is a bad thing, and if you are a white man, well that's the worst thing of all. All men are violent warmongering rapists and therefore he hates them, and he also hates himself. The feminist liberal male is a mess. A pathetic victim and he’s happy to be one as well.

I hope that clears up what I mean by the term ‘feminist liberal.’ Put simply, it’s the Rockefeller funded indoctrination process that is pushed by mainstream education establishments. It’s wrecking people’s lives. Making women feel like they have to compete with men, and that they are being discriminated against when they are doing so. Feminist liberalism makes men feel like worthless pieces of crap who should immediately kill themselves because they are not women. Feminist liberalism pushes the idea that there is no difference between men and women, and that women are victimised and oppressed because of their gender. The system wants women working, and men out of the home. It wants government to be the daddy, and the real daddy to be nowhere near his own children, kicked out of the home by a career orientated woman who hates men, and wants to prove to everybody that she can live without one. This leads children vulnerable to state control and indoctrination at a very early age as mummy is not home to look after them, and daddy is long gone, banished to weekend visits by the corrupt family court system. The end goal is state control of families, and an end to family life of mummy, daddy and the children. Future families will be nothing more than centralised breeding programmes with donor sperm fathers and the children being taken from their mother’s at birth. This is the goal, and feminist liberalism is helping them to get there.

Comic book writers in 2014 are usual feminist liberal males, and all of their themes and concerns are centred on male guilt and desperately trying not to offend anybody. They are normally statists (big government supporters) and refuse to even consider the possibility that government is bad. Their comic book heroes will be an even blend of males and females that compete on the same level, and normally work as ‘special agents’ for some higher authority. These heroes will be very young, and trapped in a perpetual state of childhood, just like the readers of the comics themselves. This celebration of perpetual adolescence stops adults from growing and learning, as they should be doing if they ever want to develop as properly functioning adults. The comic book heroes will fly around the world ‘saving the civilians’ from ‘evil dictators’ without questioning what is going on back home, and who is really in control of their corrupt two party ‘democratic’ system that offers no change and no choice. Comic book writers in 2014 are largely cowards. Their readers are not children. Children do not read comics in great numbers, adults do. Feminist liberal adults, sadly. So the next time you pick up a comic book think about the underlying themes and assumptions that are being made by the writer. Is it really a free thinking comic, or is it just more Rockefeller funded feminist liberal brainwashing, designed to destroy the family, make women feel like they are being oppressed, and turning men into self hating sad sack losers? Read the comics for yourself, you’ll see.

No comments:

Post a Comment