The Shocking Truth about Corporate Diversity

This ‘diversity’ stuff that we always talk about in relation to #Comicsgate and Disney Star Wars is just a code word for anti white, anti male, anti heterosexuality, right? Well yes, we know this to be true, and to pretend that it’s anything but, is objectively, and factually incorrect, but there is a lot more to this than meets the eye.

Here are the facts. If you are working in the mainstream, writing corporate narratives for the masses, it’s perfectly fine to kick the straight white guy in the balls, over and over again. Whitey is the bad guy, but more importantly, he’s the bad guy who is never allowed to fight back. Sure, some of the white customers of the corporate diversity narratives complain about it, and kick up a bit of a fuss on You Tube, which still allows the male voice to speak in a way no longer allowed on mainstream television, but legally speaking, white boy you are screwed.

What does this have to do with ‘legally speaking,’ I hear you cry? Well, last night I viewed a red pilled video from a man called JFG, on You Tube, of course, because television would never allow this kind of discussion, where the legal requirements of the diversity business were fully outlined to me.

Diversity is big business for activist groups, and it’s big business not because white people feel bad about being white and want to make amends for perceived wrongs of the past, diversity is big business because of title seven of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This legally codified decree from the God that is government, states the following:

‘Title VII of the Act, codified as Subchapter VI of Chapter 21 of title 42 of the United States Code, prohibits discrimination by covered employers on the basis of race, colour, religion, sex or national origin. Title VII applies to and covers an employer "who has fifteen (15) or more employees for each working day in each of twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year.' 

Sounds reasonable, right? After all, discrimination based on race, colour, religion, sex or national origin is wrong, right? I agree, yes, it is wrong, but in correcting that wrong, the balance has been tipped in the opposite direction, and created a whole new class of privileged peoples, based on all of the race, colour and gender categories that are mentioned in the act.

In practical terms today, for the large corporations that give us our entertainment fodder, that civil rights act of 1964 becomes a legally binding obligation to an enforced anti-white agenda. If the corporations do not bow to the activists who represent the special category of privileged people, they leave themselves wide open to be sued, and sued for billions and billions of dollars.

Think I’m joking? I’m not. Title VII also provides that an individual can bring a private lawsuit against a corporation if they do not comply to enforced diversity. This happens, and it happens all of the time.

Here’s just one of the numerous examples of what happens to a corporation if they dare to go up against the special class of non-white privileged people.

Google the name Byron Allen, and his $20 billion lawsuit against Comcast. Mr. Allen is a very successful black businessman, and knows all about diversity, and how to make it work for him. He knows that if corporations do not bow to his demands for representation, that he has the full weight of the law behind him. That law will support his demands, and literally put money into his privileged pocket.

This is big money stuff. It’s not about far-left activism ideology. It’s not about virtue signalling. It’s not about Dan Slott or Mark Waid annoying you on twitter. It’s not about tokenism, about being nice, or feeling guilty about being white.

There is a very real corporate reality that enforces diversity, and if you are foolish enough to ignore that reality, you will be sued, and the corporation you (used to) work for will be made liable for billions of dollars in damages.

If this happens, you will lose your job, and you will never work for another corporation ever again, plus, you will have the mainstream media calling you a Grand Wizard of the KKK for the rest of your life. You will be the epitome of evil, and you will be so broke, that you’ll be living alone, homeless, denigrated, hated, despised, rejected, totally destroyed.

This is all because of the 1964 legal requirement for enforced diversity. There is no conspiracy here. It’s the law. Now, can you see why there appears to be an ideological consensus in American corporate life? Do you see why your comics, and your television, and your cinema all appear to be doing pretty much the same thing?

This is not about people being on the left. This is about people not wanting to be sued. It’s about people wanting to have a job. It’s about people not wanting to be hated, thrown out of their homes, and made to live under a subway begging for change to buy that one hit of a heroin that will take the pain away forever.

So, next time you complain about anti-white/anti-male enforced diversity, and demand that Kathleen Kennedy, or C.B Cebulski, or JJ Abrams be fired, and replaced by somebody less politically correct, or less infested in far left identity politics activism, remember what corporate diversity is really about.

All of the individuals that we complain about on YouTube and twitter work for American corporations. They are smart people, and they know all about the dangers of doing anything that goes against the legally requirements of the 1964 Civil rights act, and in particular, clause seven. They know that if they fail to bend the knee to diversity, which is anti-white and anti-male, then the corporations that they work for, will get sued, by people like Byron Allen, for billions of dollars, and that that they will never work in the corporate arena ever again.

Everybody knows that ‘diversity’ is a codeword for anti-white, and anti-male. We know. The corporations know, and the individuals who work for the corporations also know. We can complain about it until the cows come home, but corporations are not going to change, because they cannot change.

Diversity is here to stay, like it or not. It is a legal requirement in the United States of America today to be anti-white and anti-male. If you even attempt to go against this reality you will have the full weight of the law coming crashing down upon your neck. This is a fact, and for more information about all of this, please watch, ‘The Perplexing Case of Starbucks Pt. II | w/ Frame Game, TPS #62. On JFG Livestreams.’ I’ll leave a link to the video below, and I’m looking forward to your comments on this one. Cheers guys, thanks for reading/watching, take care, and never forget, diversity is strength, question it, and you’ll see just how strongly enforced it truly is.

Feeding Time (How westen neoliberalism created an Islamic monster)

#WhiteGenocide (A webcomic about the anti-white agenda)

50-Word (Comic) Review: We Are Robin #5: Indoctrinating Children into Government Mandated ‘Diversity’

Writer: Lee Bermejo
Artist: Jorge Corona
Publisher: DC
Released: 28th October 2015


Introduce fatherless young diversity tropes, a cackling villain, a philanthropic Bat-friend. Daddy-state needs children, reinforces violent coercion with paper law justification, always needing young recruits. Can’t portray ‘controversial’ truth in DC, reduced to politically correct diversity programming. Push female emancipation. It’s the 1950's. Don’t mention statism. I see patterns here.


Rating: 3/10 


Did that ‘review’ make any sense? Probably not, so I’ll explain. ‘We are Robin #5’ is a book about young superhero types. As is to be expected in mainstream comic books of 2015, these young superheroes are very diverse, and largely female. The story follows them as they beat up a sexist male, and argue about a mystery bloke who wants to fund their crime-fighting comic book escapades. The book concludes with a cackling villain trying to recruit them into his evil gang of murderous miscreants. Will they join him, or will they accept an offer of help from the mysteriously minted (Bat) bloke? Why should we care about them, and why should we care about their choice of future employer/benefactor? I don’t know. I couldn’t get anything out of these characters. I guess if you’ve read the previous four issues (I haven’t) then you’ll give a damn? This is my first look at the title, and what I’m reading here is a book that’s pushing the usual youth diversity message that you get in pretty much all mainstream/corporate/statist programming vehicles. The kids are shown as vulnerable, as needing a ‘father’ as they are out on the streets alone, so why isn’t the real life father substitute (the state) given a role within the narrative? The state doesn’t exist in this book. Why is that? I find that to be very weird. Is this a Batman book thing? Did the state collapse at the end of the Endgame arc? Does that mean that there is no longer any collectivist in a suit who is pretending to represent the people of Gotham? Does that mean that the people are finally free from the collectivised violence of top down state control? Does that mean that we don’t have to sigh at the television as creepy would-be controllers go through their tired routines of offering bribes to their increasingly disenfranchised fool voters? If so, if the world of Batman is now an ‘anarchist’ world, then the absence of the state within this narrative would make sense. Is that’s what’s happening here, or is it just a case of a comic book writer not thinking about the state at all, and how it recruits traumatised children into their control system of human enslavement? If you write a comic book about kids looking for a father substitute, and don’t include the NUMBER ONE father substitute in the entire world (the state) you are either not paying attention to reality, or you are deliberately ignoring uncomfortable truths about the nature of the world as it is today. I’ll give writer Lee Bermejo the benefit of the doubt and assume that he hasn’t really thought about the violently coercive nature of the modern state and just wants to write a PC comic book about ‘diverse’ characters. If that’s what you are after, then buy the book, but for anybody interested in reality, you’re not going to get a lot out of this one. 


* If the world portrayed within this book is in a state of anarchy (freedom from state control) please let me know, and I’ll happily take back everything that I’ve just written. 

50-Word-Review: The Uncanny Inhumans #1- Starring Christine Legarde as Medusa

Writer: Charles Soule
Artist: Steve McNiven
Publisher: Marvel/Disney
Released: 21st October 2015


Medusa as Christine Lagarde, Hillary Clinton, Angela Merkel, totalitarians masquerading as liberators, protectors. Humanity enslaved to collectivised left, on the Daily Show/ CNN. Male emasculation as female liberation, cheat on your husband, in his face, no shame, immorality is tolerance, kill tradition, diversity a mantra, collectivisation, feminist New World Order.



Rating: 2/10


There’s two stories going on in ‘The Uncanny Inhumans #1# but they didn’t particularly grip me. The first one involves Black Bolt trying to get his son back from cartoon evil ‘Kang the Conqueror.’ The second story involves his wife (Queen Medusa) acting like a globalist politician, ‘Your world is our world. We will always fight to keep it safe.’ Medusa is the empowered boss of this book, working with what looks a UN approved superhero diversity team, appearing on collectivist, progressive media platforms (The Daily Show), and concluding her day by kissing her new boyfriend in front of her ex-husband’s (are they even divorced yet?) face. What does she think about her missing son? It is her son, as well as Black Bolt’s, right? We don’t know, as she never mentions it, she’s far too busy with her political agenda, and new boyfriend to care about a missing boy, even if he is her own son. Oh, by the way, she’s a heroine in this book, not a villain. Yep, what we have here is the typical ‘progressive’ feminist protagonist, more concerned with her career and personal pleasure than the welfare of her own family. She’s not a woman, she’s a representation of the very worst kind of man, but that’s third-wave feminism for you, and that’s exactly what you are getting in this comic book. Female empowerment is always pushed as a good thing as it emasculates men, denies the biological reality of femininity, and pushes females into positions of authority within the new state collectivist system of human enslavement. Females are encouraged to join this system where they can boss around/protect the poor innocent victim/voters that grovel at their feet in willing supplication. Females know what is best, because they are female, and they get to tell us all what to think, feel and do. If you disagree with them that means you are you are a misogynist bigot and are a danger to the wonderful new world order that is currently being ushered in by the wonderful progressive liberal writers working for globalist programmers Marvel/Disney comics. If you disagree with any of this progressive agenda then you are a barrier to ‘progress,’ to be ostracised from society and thrown in jail if you continue to speak up on any of these issues and invade the ‘safe space’ non-reality of all that push it. Hey guys, blokes, men, and any traditionally minded female who values family, respect, honour and real femininity over far-left communist inspired ideology. Why are you reading these comics? You do realise that they are attacking YOU, don’t you? I read them to expose this anti-human ideology, and to talk about it in these ‘reviews,’ because nobody else is doing it, and comic books are being given a free reign to push this collectivist crap. I have to write about it, because I disagree with what they are pushing, and I want to call them out on it. That’s my excuse for (occasionally) buying these horrible tools of Marxist/Globalist/FemiNazi propaganda. What is yours? 




* Bonus story is statist bull**** with an agent of the state rescuing a poor innocent helpless civilian/victim from evil white men with beards. Same old s***.

‘Diversity’ in DC Comic Books- A statistical breakdown of the lead protagonists in DC Comic books released on 17/6/2015

I hear a lot about ‘diversity’ in comic books these days, so I decided to take one week in comic books, one publisher (DC) and to look at the comic books to see how ‘diverse’ they actually are. The following books are either single person protagonist books, or two person protagonist books. I have not included the ‘team’ books that were released in the same week by DC (Four titles) as all four titles had multiple protagonists, both male and female. All of the titles that are listed below are single-issue comics, and were released by DC comics on Wednesday 17th June 2015. The list is simple. Name of comic, then the age, gender and race of the main protagonist(s).




Astro City #24 - Non Human (ape)

Black Canary #1- Late teens/early twenties female (white)

Doomed #1 –Late teens/early twenties male (non-white)

Dr. Fate #1 – Late teens/early twenties male (non-white)

Harley Quinn & Power Girl #1- Late teens/early twenties females (white)

Martian Manhunter #1 – Alien.

Prez #1 – Late teens/early twenties female (white)

Robin Son Of Batman #1 – Early teens (male)

Sensation Comics Featuring Wonder Woman #11- Early twenties (female)

Sinestro #12 – Alien

Superman Wonder Woman #18 – Early twenties male and female (white)

Wonder Woman (2011) #41 – Early twenties female (white)


Conclusions

- None of the comic books have protagonists over the age of 30 years old (excluding aliens).
- White male protagonists appear in two out of twelve books. Superman (an alien) and Robin (a prepubescent boy).
- Young female protagonists appear in six out of twelve books.
- Non white (human) protagonists appear in two out of twelve books.
- Non human protagonists appear in three out of twelve books, four if you include Superman.
- Young females dominate the list of protagonists in DC comics during the week of 17/6/15.
- White males and non-white protagonists are minorities, represented in only two out of twelve books.
- Aliens (or non-humans) are protagonists in more books (four) than white males or non-white protagonists.
- None of the human characters are over the age of thirty.
- DC Comic books protagonists (on 17/6/15) are all young, and the majority are female.


Is that ‘diversity’ in comic books? Here’s the dictionary definition of the word:

diversity (daɪˈvɜːsɪtɪ  Pronunciation for diversity ) 

Definitions
noun

the state or quality of being different or varied
a point of difference
(logic) the relation that holds between two entities when and only when they are not identical; the property of being numerically distinct


DC comic books don’t appear (at least based on this sample week) to be very different or varied at all.

This is not my opinion. It is factual information based on looking at their actual comic book protagonists. If you are a young girl, or an alien, that’s great, but what about the rest of us? For everybody else living on planet Earth (and for ANYBODY) over the age of twenty-eight, you’re not going to see yourself being represented within the pages of a DC comic book, at least this week.

If (like me) you are a white male in his forties, then forget it. You’ll see alien shapeshifters, young female rock-stars, talking Gorillas, and girl presidents (Prez #1) but a male in his forties? A male in the demographic of the actual people buying the comic books? Don’t be daft. Who would want to read a comic book about a guy who actually looks like the people who are buying comic books? Don’t be silly. Now, here’s my latest idea for a new teen female punk rock rebellious heroine. It’s super cool dude, those old comic book geeks will love it, and it’s super PC and ‘diverse.’





.

Comic review: Doctor Fate #1: PC Muslim Hero Abandons Faith to Join Egyptian Cat Cult

Writer: Paul Levitz
Artist: Sonny Liew
Publisher: DC Comics
Released: 17th June 2015




Here’s an interesting book, that within its pages includes a valuable lesson about the portrayal of Islam in contemporary neoliberal western comic book narratives.

The book stars a Muslim hero, with a white Mother, a hot girlfriend, and a promising future career as a Doctor. Wait, it gets even better. If all of that wasn’t enough for you, the narrative then has him saving a baby from underneath the wheels of a subway train, sacrificing his life for a complete and utter stranger.

What a guy hey? See multiculturalism is great, no problems to be had at all. Muslims love to integrate and contribute to society, they even save babies from underneath subway trains. I say let them all in, and take over the country, take over the world actually, what could possibly go wrong?

White racists need to die anyway. Let’s bring in the dawn of this brave new era of ‘moderate’ Islam, with tolerance and diversity for all.

Certain kinds of people are going to love this review. They are going to read it, and positively explode with righteous indignation and rage. So I say, come on, bring it on. Come on then. Accuse me of being an evil intolerant Islamaphobic racist. I know you want to, go on, accuse me until the cows come home, it will be fun.

Jump up on that moral high horse of progressive liberalism and tell me that 99% of Muslims are moderate and tolerant. Pretend that ISIS doesn’t exist. Pretend that Saudi Arabia doesn’t exist. Pretend that Syria doesn’t exist. Pretend that Libya doesn’t exist. Pretend that Boko Haram doesn’t exist. Pretend that Sharia law doesn’t exist. Pretend that the Rochdale sex trafficking gang didn’t exist. Pretend that the Beslan school massacre didn’t happen. Pretend that the Charlie Hebdo massacre didn’t happen. Pretend that all of the other massacres and beheadings and atrocities worldwide didn’t happen as well.

Blame US foreign policy. Hell, even blame George Bush if you like. Pretend that the UK Muslim community doesn’t shut itself away in their own little communities with their own laws. Pretend that Muslims just want to integrate into society like some kind of neo-liberal mythical paradise. Pretend that reality itself is an abstract construct and those moral high horses and neoliberal utopias are the ‘tolerant’ way of looking at reality.

It doesn’t matter what evidence you see or hear, it doesn’t matter, because you will always be right. Even in the middle of a massacre when you yourself are being chopped up because you are not the right kind of wahabbi Muslim. They are not extreme, it’s intolerant to say that, they are just expressing their dissatisfaction with US foreign policy as they chop you and your kids into little pieces whilst screaming for their god like a nightmarish cult of devil worshippers. No, you will always be right, because you are a liberal, a dead, chopped up liberal, but always right, and always tolerant and always passive and pathetic and indoctrinated and self-hating and feeble and weak, and useless until the very end.

Here’s a question. Have you ever read a comic book where Muslims were portrayed as the villains? I have. It happened ONCE, in a book called ‘Holy Terror,’ by Frank Miller. The following quotation pretty much sums up how it was received by the mainstream press:

"Frank Miller doesn't do things halfway. One of the true comic-book greats, he’s created several of the most extraordinary stories ever to grace the art form. So perhaps it's fitting that now he's produced one of the most appalling, offensive and vindictive comics of all time ... Miller's Holy Terror is a screed against Islam, completely uninterested in any nuance or empathy toward 1.2 billion people he conflates with a few murderous conspiracy theorists." (Spencer Ackerman of Wired Magazine)

You don’t criticise Islam in comic books, even in a very small way, and if you do, then prepare for a whole heap of trouble coming your way. No, if you write Muslim characters in a 2015 era comic book then they must ALWAYS be positive, heroic, tolerant, liberal drips, just like the writers themselves actually.

Doctor Fate #1 then is a specimen of it’s time, an example of how you write Muslim characters in contemporary comic books. For that reason alone the book is worthy of study. I don’t expect contemporary comic books to demonise the Muslim community, because that would be horrible, and completely unfair to the vast majority of peaceful Muslims around the world. So what do I want? What is the point that I’m making here?

My point is that comic books have to stop being so bloody cowardly. I know that the writers watch the news. I know that they see the same things that I do. I know that they have opinions on it, so why am I not seeing a DIVERSE range of opinions in my comic books when it comes to the portrayal of Muslim characters? They can’t always be heroes can they?

What is being created here is a parallel universe, with mainstream comic book creators going out of their way not to offend. This snake-bellied cowardice is creating a mythical almost idolatrous image of Muslim people that is completely at odds with what is happening in the real world and DAILY on our television sets. What I am complaining about here is a LACK of diversity when it comes to the portrayal of Muslims in mainstream comic books, as described by the dictionary definition of the word.

Diversity
/daɪˈvɜːsɪtɪ/
noun 
1.
the state or quality of being different or varied
2.
a point of difference
3.
(logic) the relation that holds between two entities when and only when they are not identical; the property of being numerically distinct

All I am calling for here is for diversity, a point of difference, and when it comes to the portrayal of Muslims in comic books in 2015 I am not seeing this at all. What I am seeing is a very PC image, an image of the tolerant Muslim, of the not very religious Muslim, the neo-liberal fantasy Muslim. It’s a fantasy as real as the moderate rebels in Syria and the integrated Muslim television characters I see in Eastenders, that fantasy neoliberal London paradise of integrated communities that bears zero resemblance to the real London of today.

So what about this actual comic book? This is supposed to be a review, right? Yeah it is, so here we go.

The art is messy, the tone is soft and fluffy, and the story is about Ancient Egyptian Gods preparing a new flood to wipe out humanity. The Muslim protagonist takes to the Egyptian religion very easily, a cat speaks to him, tells him to put on a silly hat, and after some initial fears that have nothing whatsoever to do with his own faith, on it goes. This means that the protagonist is about as serious and dedicated to his religion as neo-liberals are to their own. He doesn’t even identify himself as a Muslim. Instead he very noticeable describes himself as ‘an American.’ Ah, it’s the liberal dream of diversity, alive and well within the pages of comic books at least.

In reality, this guy is a terrible Muslim. He completely disregards his own faith and jumps on board a new religion like it’s no big deal at all. He is a Muslim, but his faith plays no part in this comic book narrative whatsoever. His Muslim identity then is exposed as hollow, and meaningless. It’s a token gesture, a bone of political correctness thrown out so DC can stamp a label of ‘diversity’ onto one of it’s comic books.

This book is not going to impress any strong believer of the Islamic religion, as the religious aspect is mere background, and when faced with miraculous, amazing things that are happening around him, the protagonist doesn’t even refer to his faith one single time. So if it’s not trying to impress actual Muslims, who is the book trying to impress, and what is it trying to do?

You already know my answer to that question, right? The book is simply ticking PC boxes, and going out of its way to not offend anybody. The ironic thing about this situation is that offending Muslims is an extremely easy thing to do, and as hard as you try not to offend, the more likely it is that you will end up offending somebody. I’ll explain.

The very fact that the writer has put the old Egyptian religion into the lap of a young Muslim is probably something that he didn’t even think about. It’s just a story, something cool to do, right? What he has actually done, if he thought about it for a bit, is to make a young Muslim a Kuffar (an unbeliever) by willingly accepting the authority of another religion that is not Islam. As soon as he buys into the powers of the magic helmet, he has in essence rejected his own Muslim faith.

‘He that chooses a religion over Islam, it will not be accepted from him and in the world to come he will be one of the lost.’
Quran 3:85, "The Imrans,"

So by going out of his way not to offend liberal sensibilities, what writer Paul Levitz has actually done here is to create a narrative that demeans Islam and would likely cause huge offence to many Muslims all around the world.

What a twit.

That’s how it goes when you pussy foot around a topic that needs to be tackled with true courage and integrity. The more you try not to offend, the more you do offend, and that’s the problem with Islam, the problem that mainstream comic books do not want to discuss.

Writer Paul Levitz probably really is a very decent and tolerant person, but that counts for nothing, and by trying to write another PC Muslim hero he’s just gone and dug his own pit of trouble. I feel sorry for the guy, really. His intentions were good, they always are with liberal types, but this whole fake ‘diversity’ thing is a difficult construct to escape from, especially with people shouting ‘racist’ at you whenever you even question it.

I didn’t hate the book. I see it as misguided, and it teaches a valuable lesson about the portrayal of Islamic heroes in contemporary comic books, so it’s worthy of a purchase. American popular culture is at a bit of a crossroads at the moment, it’s lost, confused, and trying to find it’s way through these dark times of neo-liberalism where truth is dying at the alter of political correctness. This time period in world history will make for a fascinating area of study at some future date, but at the moment it’s not easy. I can write my reviews and say whatever I like, but the poor comic book writers are trying to make a living, they are trying to be PC, trying to be good people, but ultimately they are just ending up getting lost in a maze littered with corporate ‘diversity’ landmines.


Rating: 4/10 (PC Muslim hero ends up quickly abandoning his faith at the first opportunity, oops)